"Reverence for God in the present work is preserved by capitalizing
pronouns, including You, Your, and Yours, which refer to Him."
Preface to NKJV
1. Before reading the quick hits below as we revisit RR, please read the entire column by clicking on "Reclaiming Rainbows" in the right column under November issues.
2. The responses to "Reclaiming Rainbows" have been fast and not furious except for one person who means well but cannot distinguish the will of God from the mirror's reflection. Indeed, some of the challenging to hysterical responses to RR from the left and right seem related to my inability to rationalize their extra-Biblical ideologies by the book; noting the apparent inability for the extremes to receive the loving inclusions despite rite proscription in a Psalm 25:10 kinda way. Simply, it's the problem peculiar to the extremes of revising Genesis: "So man created God in his own image; in the image of man, man created God."
3. It has been sad to see the right object to the inclusions of our grace-filled Lord and sad to see the left insist that loving everybody must include presiding at a rite proscribed by Holy Scripture; reminding me that neither extreme will allow for genuine love to include all people while proscribing some behavior. The left and right share an arrogance of feeling there's no need for improvement in how they behave as reflective of belief in God as personified in Jesus and prescribed in Holy Scripture. In my estimation, and I pledge public confession and repentance if I am wrong by contradiction to Jesus and Holy Scripture, living in God's neighborhood is knowing God loves us just the way we are but too much to leave us just the way we are.
4. I have been frustrated by the Biblical ignorance/defiance of the left and right in excluding God's included (right) while insisting on what God has precluded (left); saying, essentially, "I know that's what Jesus and the Bible say buuuuuuuut I think..." That kinda arrogance from the extremes just overwhelms me to intellectual numbness. It's the movement from imago Dei to imago ego in our increasingly naval-gazing civil and ecclesiastical cultures.
5. Yeeeeeeet, I apologize to my dear friend for running with his vision about the pins before getting this clarification: "I would not have come up with the idea of adding the word reclaim to the rainbow. I think the rainbow can do without that. I think if a few million Christians would wear a rainbow lapel pin, with love for all in their hearts, it will eventually be noticed here and there...give gazillions of opportunities to tell others about God's gracious promise to the entire world...We will be able to talk about God's grace and demonstrate His love..." I agree. I confess my sin of adding reclaim without getting his consent and also how it would repel rather than invite conversation, prayer, and the ultimate goal of experiencing the fullness of His graces. Frankly, I see how that has worked with my pony Return2. People ask me what the name means and then...
6. Of course, there are those, especially from the middle - You know the ones who are moderately committed to some things and Someone for fear of offending bravehearts with their fainthearts and not being liked irrespective of Acts 5:29! - who cause me to recall Moody being criticized - I think by Presbyterians - for how he did evangelism. He said, "I prefer how I do it to how you don't do it." He also said something that both extremes may want to consider to convert their ideologies to fidelities: "The only way to keep a broken vessel full is to keep it always under the tap." I think moderates make Him puke in a Revelation 3:1-6; 14-22 kinda way. That's why I think Biblical Christianity is not left, right, or moderate. It's, uh, Christian by the book.
7. Years ago, I was attacked by someone for saying I cannot preside at a same-sex wedding while being a passionate advocate for gay civil rights: "What if one of your sons were gay?" My response: "Uh, I don't understand your question. I will love my sons regardless. Sexual orientation has nothing to do with loving my sons. Even if my sons were gay and professing marital relations, I would love them, love their partners, and receive them just like I would receive sons engaged in marital relations more reflective of Biblical Christianity. I get it from Jesus who loves you and me like that. I can totally love anyone; but I don't have to appreciate every part of their behavior. So, really, I don't understand how your question relates to my sons if they were gay. I'd just love them; even while not agreeing with a part of their lifestyles. But I'd love them any way."
Sooooooo I expect to add a rainbow to what I hang around my neck without the word on it despite my commitment to reclaiming rainbows by the book.
Hans' approach is better than my first response to his vision.
I think there's a lesson in that for all of us - left, right, middle, and...Christian.
There's always room for improvement.
"Behold, I make all things new...even..."
Blessings and Love!
I think your friend is wrong for not wanting to use the word "reclaim". It is essential, I think, to what you're trying to do. Just as we must reclaim the cross from being a simple piece of jewelry, because it has been stolen, co-opted and manipulated to mean something less than it is.
"There's always room for improvement." Most of us like to think that, if absolutely necessary, there could perhaps yet be a little improvement squeezed in to our nearly perfect selves...
I think the truth is, there's always NEED for improvement, which is why the Son never stops asking the Father to send the Spirit (Who is the One who actually accomplishes the work of improving us, because the only improvements that matter are the ones which transform us more and more into His likeness, and that is a work of the Spirit, not our flesh.).
A HUGE sign that the Deceiver still has way too much influence/power in the world is the huge self-improvement industry. Those who believe they can improve themselves in any meaningful way are fools along the lines of a doctor who has himself-herself as a patient.
Right on! I consider myself , as you already know leaning to the left on most issues. However I do not support same sex marriage but even tho I don't have kids, I liken Brandon to the closest thing to my kid. If he told me he was gay, I would still love him but not be in love with his lifestyle. I have a immediate family member who had an abortion some years back. I still love them dearly and always have, however I would not have drove them to the clinic to have the procedure done as it goes against my biblical beliefs. But I still love them. Both these issues go against my biblical beliefs, but there is only one person who is pure and perfect and its not me.
Post a Comment