Kopp Disclosure
(John 3:19-21)
@#$%
"Reverence for God in the present work is preserved by
capitalizing
pronouns, including You,
Your, and Yours, which refer to Him."
Preface to NKJV
@#$%
1. Before reading
the quick hits below as we revisit RR, please read the entire column by
clicking on "Reclaiming Rainbows" in the right column under November
issues.
2. The responses
to "Reclaiming Rainbows" have been fast and not furious except for
one person who means well but cannot distinguish the will of God from the mirror's
reflection. Indeed, some of the challenging to hysterical responses to RR
from the left and right seem related to my inability to rationalize their
extra-Biblical ideologies by
the book; noting the apparent inability for the extremes to receive
the loving inclusions despite rite proscription in a Psalm 25:10 kinda
way. Simply, it's the problem peculiar to the extremes of revising
Genesis: "So man created God in his own image; in the image of man, man
created God."
3. It has been
sad to see the right object to the inclusions of our grace-filled Lord and
sad to see the left insist that loving everybody must include presiding at a
rite proscribed by Holy Scripture; reminding me that neither extreme will allow
for genuine love to include all people while proscribing some behavior.
The left and right share an arrogance of feeling
there's no need for improvement in how they behave as reflective of
belief in God as personified in Jesus and prescribed in Holy Scripture.
In my estimation, and I pledge public confession and repentance if I am
wrong by contradiction to Jesus and Holy Scripture, living in God's
neighborhood is knowing God loves us just the way we are but too much to leave us just the way
we are.
4. I have been
frustrated by the Biblical ignorance/defiance of the left and right in
excluding God's included (right) while insisting on what God has precluded
(left); saying, essentially, "I know that's what Jesus and the
Bible say buuuuuuuut I
think..." That kinda arrogance from the extremes just
overwhelms me to intellectual numbness. It's the movement from imago Dei to imago ego in our
increasingly naval-gazing civil and ecclesiastical cultures.
5. Yeeeeeeet, I apologize to
my dear friend for running with his vision about the pins before getting this
clarification: "I would not have come up with the idea of adding the word reclaim to the
rainbow. I think the rainbow can do without that. I think if a few
million Christians would wear a rainbow lapel pin, with love for all in their
hearts, it will eventually be noticed here and there...give gazillions of
opportunities to tell others about God's gracious promise to the entire
world...We will be able to talk about God's grace and demonstrate His
love..." I agree. I confess my sin of adding reclaim without getting
his consent and also how it would repel rather than invite conversation,
prayer, and the ultimate goal of experiencing the fullness of His
graces. Frankly, I see how that has worked with my pony Return2.
People ask me what the name means and then...
6. Of course,
there are those, especially from the middle - You know the ones who are moderately committed to
some things and Someone for fear of offending bravehearts with their
fainthearts and not being liked
irrespective of Acts 5:29! - who cause me to recall Moody being
criticized - I think by Presbyterians - for how he did evangelism. He said, "I prefer
how I do it to how you don't do it." He also said something that
both extremes may want to consider to convert their ideologies to
fidelities: "The only way to keep a broken vessel full is to keep it
always under the tap." I think moderates make Him puke in a
Revelation 3:1-6; 14-22 kinda way. That's why I think Biblical Christianity
is not left, right, or moderate. It's, uh, Christian by the book.
7. Years ago, I
was attacked by someone for saying I cannot preside at a same-sex wedding while
being a passionate advocate for gay civil rights: "What if one of your
sons were gay?" My response: "Uh, I don't understand your
question. I will love my sons regardless. Sexual orientation has
nothing to do with loving my sons. Even if my sons were gay and
professing marital relations, I would love them, love their partners, and
receive them just like I would receive sons engaged in marital relations more
reflective of Biblical Christianity. I get it from Jesus who loves you
and me like that. I can totally love anyone; but I don't have to
appreciate every part of their behavior. So, really, I don't understand
how your question relates to my sons if they were gay. I'd just love
them; even while not agreeing with a part of their lifestyles. But I'd
love them any
way."
Sooooooo I expect to add a
rainbow to what I hang around my neck without the word on it despite my
commitment to reclaiming rainbows by
the book.
Hans' approach is
better than my first response to his vision.
Hmm.
I think there's a
lesson in that for all of us - left, right, middle, and...Christian.
There's always
room for improvement.
@#$%
"Behold, I make all things new...even..."
@#$%
Blessings and Love!
3 comments:
I think your friend is wrong for not wanting to use the word "reclaim". It is essential, I think, to what you're trying to do. Just as we must reclaim the cross from being a simple piece of jewelry, because it has been stolen, co-opted and manipulated to mean something less than it is.
"There's always room for improvement." Most of us like to think that, if absolutely necessary, there could perhaps yet be a little improvement squeezed in to our nearly perfect selves...
I think the truth is, there's always NEED for improvement, which is why the Son never stops asking the Father to send the Spirit (Who is the One who actually accomplishes the work of improving us, because the only improvements that matter are the ones which transform us more and more into His likeness, and that is a work of the Spirit, not our flesh.).
A HUGE sign that the Deceiver still has way too much influence/power in the world is the huge self-improvement industry. Those who believe they can improve themselves in any meaningful way are fools along the lines of a doctor who has himself-herself as a patient.
Right on! I consider myself , as you already know leaning to the left on most issues. However I do not support same sex marriage but even tho I don't have kids, I liken Brandon to the closest thing to my kid. If he told me he was gay, I would still love him but not be in love with his lifestyle. I have a immediate family member who had an abortion some years back. I still love them dearly and always have, however I would not have drove them to the clinic to have the procedure done as it goes against my biblical beliefs. But I still love them. Both these issues go against my biblical beliefs, but there is only one person who is pure and perfect and its not me.
Post a Comment